logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.11.22 2013고합222
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강요행위등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of six months.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 2012, Defendant A knew that G (here, 13 years of age) who was a child of F, who was a child of F, who was aware of his knowledge of the birth of the Defendant, went to the above G, thereby going to go to the said G, and, on the ground that there is a lack of living expenses from July 2012, the Defendant solicited the said G to engage in sexual traffic, thereby allowing the said G to engage in sexual traffic.

Since then, the defendant had access to the Internet holding site of "H," etc. using the telecom and PC computer, and opened a hosting room directly with "Seoul 00 dong," and set the place of the promise to allow the above G to engage in commercial sex acts while leaving the place of the promise and keep the money received in return for commercial sex acts. The defendant directly received commercial sex acts from G by directly linking the above hosting site with the defendant's ID to the above hosting site to determine the promise through sexual purchase and Internet hosting and direct G to conduct commercial sex acts.

around July 2012, the Defendant: (a) allowed G to conduct Internet hosting in the 'Jel located in the above 'Jel', where it is located in the above 'Jel', by allowing G to conduct commercial sex acts against Escoper B and receive 120,000 won in return; and (b) allowed the above G to conduct commercial sex acts for about two months from around that time to September 2012 at the Mour, etc. located in Seoul, where it is difficult to know the trade name in B in Seoul, and received KRW 10-150,000 won in return.

As a result, the defendant used that G, which is a juvenile, is subject to his protection, to have G become the counterpart to the act of purchasing the sex of a juvenile.

2. Defendant B, on July 2012, through “K, which is an Internet hosting site, trading sex with Defendant B, who received money from Defendant G (V, 13 years of age).

arrow