logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.09.25 2014고단740
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Although the Defendant owned the real estate in Gyeonggi-gun C and Gyeonggi-gun D and the real estate in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, 205 Dong 1002, and the above real estate was imposed excessive liabilities as collateral, most of the income was being used in paying principal and interest of debt and was under circumstances where the above real estate was not readily traded, and thus, even if the victims were not able to repay the borrowed money until the due date for repayment as agreed with the victims, the Defendant by deceiving the victims as follows, and acquired the total of KRW 177 million.

1. On May 2, 2011, the criminal defendant against the victim F made a false statement that "if he/she lends only 20 million won, he/she will use it only for six months and make a full payment," by leaving a phone to the victim at the loyalty point of the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Bank, and that it was transferred from the victim to the new bank account (Account Number H) in the name of the defendant in the name of the defendant.

Then, around May 17, 2012, the Defendant: “Around May 17, 2012, the Defendant got phone from the victim at a branch of the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City I Bank to lend KRW 3 million,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won

2. On December 15, 201, the Defendant against the victim J made phone calls to the victim in K with the wife population at Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, and made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant borrowed money to return money only three months. He/she wishes to repay money after three months. He/she has received money from the victim to the said new bank in return for the borrowed money.”

On December 22, 2011, the Defendant, at the time of the Gyeonggi-do economy, called the phone to the victim in K, who is in the wife population at the time of the Gyeonggi-si.

arrow