1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except where the plaintiff added the following additional judgments, even if considering all the claims supplemented by the appellate court. Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiff’s additional determination indicated the Defendant E’s employee N’s signature and the remainder KRW 71,962,00 on the trading list as of April 8, 2016, and the same year.

8. The defendant's obligation to pay goods against the plaintiff should be recognized, since the net C signed on each of the trading statements dated 22, October 17, 199 and each of the trading statements dated 22, 200.

However, there is no evidence to prove whether the N is Defendant E’s employee, and whether there was the authority to approve the obligation at the time, and even according to the Plaintiff’s assertion, it is difficult to view it as an acceptance of the obligation, since there is no record of the balance in each specification of transactions signed by the network C

3. The decision of the first instance court on the conclusion is justifiable.

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed for all reasons.