The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant was in the first instance judgment, and the Defendant appeared to have followed the entirety of the instant crimes and expressed his attitude to repenting the mistake in depth.

In addition, on January 5, 2016, after the sentence of the lower judgment, the Defendant deposited 10 million won with the pertinent university in order to reflect the fact that the Defendant, as the student president of L University, received the so-called “reward rebates” and carried out business affairs unlawfully.

B. In view of the fact that the Defendant, while operating the event organizer, appears to have been entitled to exercise the right against other universities other than L University by displaying his own business or an artist’s extra-legal ability, it is difficult to readily conclude that the Defendant, solely based solely on the influence on the above university students’ conference or on the “covering”, was involved in the right.

In this context, the Defendant is in a position to support the aged’s parents, denial, ageed two daughters, the Defendant’s family members and the family members of the Defendant, and some of the case parties want to support the Defendant, and the Defendant appears to have made a donation to various public organizations, etc., which should be considered in favor of the Defendant in the course of the determination of the punishment for the instant crime.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant as the 29 major principal of L University's 29 major principal of the L University's 29 major principal of students, and received 33,950,000 won for the production of school events and graduation from the specific company. After the term of office of the principal of the total student group, he voluntarily established a planning company and offered 8 million won to C, which is the head of the 30 major student group, in return for allowing him to hold events at L University. After the term of office of the principal of the total student group, A was elected as the principal of the 31 major total student group by modifying A's response to inquiry about criminal history data and manipulating voting results, and he was ruled out from the specific company under the above A.