logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2020.11.26 2020고단1336
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 19, 2012, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 5 million for a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Incheon District Court's Busan Branch Branch.

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle BM7 vehicle in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On February 20, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol 0.188% in blood alcohol level on February 13:39, 2020, while driving the said car on the front road in Seocheon-si and driving it on the road in front of Seocheon-si, and turned back from D to E-face.

Since a house is a side road, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by properly examining the back and the left and right of the driver while under the influence of alcohol.

Nevertheless, the defendant's negligence of driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol due to the negligence of the defendant, which led to the left-hand part of the passenger vehicle of the victim F (ma, 30 years old) G, which was parked at the same time, followed the left-hand part of the passenger vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim F’s occupational negligence on the part of the victim F’s injury, such as salt ties and tensions in the U.S. in the treatment days, and on the part of the passenger car at Abdon-purg, H (E and 35 years of age) who is the passenger of Abdon-purg, about two weeks of treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (MM7 vehicle) The Defendant driven a BM7 vehicle while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.188% in the section of about 300 meters of blood alcohol level from J-do, J in the above temporary border to J-si, Seocheon-si, Busan.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the duty of prohibition on driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Investigation report (Confirmation of the degree of shock);

1. Report on internal investigation (additional drinking and telephone communications for victims) by each suspect;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Report on the circumstances of the drinking driver and on the circumstantial statement of the drinking driver;

1. The written appraisal of blood alcohol;

arrow