All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) The Defendant, by coercion and intimidation, was unable to take place by coercion and intimidation, and was engaged in the instant Bosing crime, and conspiredd with other accomplices.

As such, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles.

2) In light of the various circumstances of this case’s unfair sentencing, the lower court’s sentence (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The prosecutor (unfair sentencing)’s sentence is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the records on the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant acknowledged the instant facts charged to the investigative agency and the court of original instance up to the trial court, and brought a change to the purport that the contents of the Defendant’s assertion of mistake should be considered in the course of committing the crime or the circumstances. However, on May 9, 2018, the first instance court made an independent assertion of mistake of facts (the Defendant asserted only unfair sentencing in the initial statement of reasons for appeal).

In other words, Q would allow a male-child defendant to pay money in the Philippines in the court of the court below in the following circumstances, which can be revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below.

was stated.

As above, the Defendant came to go together with the Philippines by proposing “Is money.”

In the police investigation, the police made a true statement.

In full view of the facts as stated in the Defendant and Q, G, and F, who were other accomplicess of the Republic of Korea from the Republic of Korea to the Republic of Korea at the time, as the Defendant and Q, also stated to the same effect in an investigative agency, the Defendant conspiredd with other accomplices

Since this part of the defendant's argument can be sufficiently assessed, it cannot be accepted.

B. The crime of licensing fraud committed against many unspecified persons in a planned and organized manner against the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s unfair argument of sentencing is highly likely to cause social harm.