logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.06.03 2014구합4451
지목원상회복 청구
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part regarding the lawsuit for the restoration of land category and restoration to original state among the instant lawsuit, and as of July 24, 2013 and November 13, 2013.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 25, 201, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for a building permit to newly construct a collective housing on the land of 326 square meters in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and received a building permit from the Defendant on December 14, 201.

B. On October 31, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) divided the land size of 326 square meters in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul-si, and the land size of 289 square meters in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and B large 37 square meters in Suwon-si, Suwon-si; and (b) filed an application for land alteration (land category alteration) changing the land category of 37 square meters in the divided Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, into a road from the site to a road; and (c) around that time, the Defendant divided and changed land classification upon the said application.

C. On July 9, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition to the Defendant for the change of the land category of 37 square meters in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si B road (hereinafter “instant land”). Accordingly, on July 15, 2013, the Defendant responded to the purport that the Plaintiff changed the land category of the instant land to a road upon the Plaintiff’s request was legally treated pursuant to the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, and thus, the land category of the instant land has no reason to reinstate it to a site again.

On November 1, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition to the Defendant for changing the land category of the instant land into the site. However, on November 8, 2013, the Defendant responded to the same purport as the content of the civil petition reply issued on July 15, 2013.

(hereinafter referred to as “each disposition rejecting the change of land category” in total of the Defendant’s civil petition reply as of July 15, 2013 and the civil petition reply as of November 8, 2013.

Meanwhile, on June 28, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the Defendant on May 31, 2013 as to the officially assessed individual land price of the instant land, which was determined and publicly announced by the Defendant on May 31, 2013, but the Defendant dismissed the said objection on July 24, 2013.

F. On November 4, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the publicly assessed individual land price again with the Defendant. However, the Defendant filed the objection on November 13, 2013.

arrow