A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 21, 2014, at around 04:37, the Defendant was unable to return home under the influence of alcohol in the “C” restaurant located in the “C” restaurant located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and was urged to return home from the slope E, Inspector E, and F, who was called out after receiving the 112 report.

J. L. L. L.W.

I see this son’s sound as ‘this son’, flapsing a slope E’s arms and flapsing, and ebbbbling F’s left face part one time by hand as the ebbbbbbing F’s removal.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials in relation to the handling of reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Social Service Order [the decision of the sentence], the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties [the scope of sentence of recommendation], six months to one year and April 1, 199, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in prison in 8 months due to the obstruction of performance of official duties, damage to public goods, and a suspended sentence of one million won due to the obstruction of performance of official duties in 2005, although he had a record of being sentenced to a summary order of one million won due to the obstruction of performance of official duties in 205, the defendant committed the crime of this case under the same kind of under the influence of alcohol.

However, the punishment shall be determined by taking into account the following factors: (a) the fact that the defendant was unable to repeat the crime as he reflects the mistake; (b) the fact that there was no other previous conviction for ten years since around 2005; and (c) the age, character, conduct, occupation, family relationship, property status, etc. of the defendant.

[Determination of Sentence] Two years of probation, two years of probation, and 160 hours of community service in October