A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 09:15 on May 16, 2013, the Defendant insultd the victim publicly by publicly insulting the victim “F convenience store operated by the victim E in the Da basin located in the Gu-gu Dandong-si, and the victim said that “Iskin Don-si Don-si Don-si Don-si Don-si Don-si Don-si Don-si Don-si Don-si Don-si Don-si Don-si,” and the victim reported as “Iskin Don-si Don

2. The Defendant interfered with business, at the same date, time, and place as described in paragraph (1) above, took the victim’s bath on the said ground, and obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by avoiding disturbance for about 10 minutes, such as emitting the free door of convenience points one time, and passing sound.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for filing complaints and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of insult and the choice of imprisonment), the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of interference with business and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;