A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On September 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on September 30, 2016 by imprisonment with prison labor for property damage, etc. in the support of Suwon Friwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 30, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant committed the crime of June 13, 2016, at the laundry office operated by the victim D (63 taxes, leisures) of the first floor of the building located in Ansan-si, the 15:40 on June 13, 2016, the Defendant was unable to properly repair the front lab for the kitchen that he/she had previously left to the victim under the influence of alcohol.

The author, who was in the city, and was in the city, tried to build the chairs, telephone, and rapid dried strings, and took the bath and height of the victim, such as “the same year,” “years,” and “years,” and obstructed the victim’s laund service by force for about 30 minutes by preventing customers from entering the laundry laundry by blocking the front of the laundry laundry.

2. A crime committed on June 14, 2016;

A. A. In around 17:30 on June 14, 2016, the Defendant of special intimidation: (a) the victim reported the crime set forth in paragraph 1 to the police; and (b) the Defendant saw a knife (the total length of 32cc, 19cc) that was dangerous articles in the main room of the Defendant’s residence, which was in the Defendant’s dwelling, with a knife (the total length of 32cc, the knife length of 19cc) and sound “I, I, I, and, if you do not, I, die.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried a dangerous knife knife and threatened the victim.

B. The Defendant damaged property on the said date, at the above place, and on the ground of brooms and brooms in front of the laundry, the Defendant saw the knife of the laundry glass, walls, and the floor, and caused the brooms to wear the brooms.

As a result, the defendant damaged the brooms and brooms on the market price which is not owned by the victim.

(c)

The defendant interfering with the work is a way to prevent the victim from going out of the laundry site by putting the vegetable movement, such as Section 2-A, Section 2-A, and Section 2.