(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.02.11 2014고단7248

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.02.11 2014고단7248

사기미수등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 201, the Defendant issued an alteration or alteration of a private document to the original district court on the following grounds: (a) around July 201, the Defendant: (b) changed the date of the repayment of the borrowed money in the name of the F in the name of the heir of the said F in the name of the original district court; (c) changed the F in the name of the heir of the said F in the name of the said G in the name of the original district court on July 21, 201; and (d) changed the date of preparation into “F on January 20, 2001; and (d) changed the F in the name of the original district court on July 21, 201; and (e) submitted the modified F in the name of the original district court upon receiving an application for payment order from the heir of the said F in the name of the original district court on July 21, 201.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant altered a letter of borrowed money in F, a private document related to rights and obligations, and exercised it.

2. On July 21, 201, the Defendant attempted to commit fraud: (a) filed an application for a payment order with the Suwon District Court in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 120 (Seoul-dong 80), stating that the Defendant jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant’s debt of KRW 700 million to E; and (b) filed an application for the payment order with the Defendant to the effect that “The obligor G to the obligee is KRW 233,333,350,350, the obligor H, I, and J submitted the payment order to the District Court without entering the date on which the FF entered as a joint and several surety in order to avoid the lapse of the statute of limitations and the claim due to the lapse of the statute of limitations; and (c) filed an application for the alteration of the date and date of performance as stated in the above paragraph (1). However, the Defendant did not file an application for the payment order with the original District Court to the effect that the payment order was made.

Summary of Evidence

1...

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2020.11.17 2020고정822

-제주지방법원 2015.01.16 2014고정940

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2019.05.02 2019고단127

-청주지방법원 2015.03.27 2014고단1441

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.11.13 2013고합136