A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 4, 2018, around 15:45, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) committed a violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) with a vehicle under the influence of alcohol in the front of the “D store”, and went off from the vehicle, and went off from the vehicle, and was discovered to G in the process of the official police station of the State Police Station where a female driver was dispatched after receiving a report that he/she would drive alcohol at the above place, and led a female driver to voluntarily accompany the Fran zone.

At around 16:09 on the same day, the Defendant, at the F District located in H around the same day, the reporter, “out the outside, the sound of “indiciated” was turned out of the restaurant, thereby driving and getting off the female subdivision.

"A person who drives under the influence of alcohol by the defendant, such as making a statement that the face of the defendant is red, snick, snick, and unsatisfying and satisfying, etc.

If there is a considerable reason to suspect that the police officer is required to take a drinking test, "I am son in the room", but I am 'I am 'I am'.

“Sovered,” and “Sovered,” and the police officer again refuses to conduct a measurement.

The answer of “for example.” was made by the person who asked “for example.” and clearly expresses his intention not to respond to the measurement of drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's drinking test without any justifiable reason.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseless Driving) was driven by the Defendant from the front side of the cafeteria “Eh-gu” restaurant to the front side of the public road at the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The ledger using a drinking measuring instrument, and the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing video CDs that have refused to measure alcohol;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act (a point of refusing to measure drinking), Article 152 subparagraph 1, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (a point of refusing to drive without a license) concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Aggravation concurrent crimes;