A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of “C” on a lease of Nos. 406, 504, and 506 of the Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B Officetel.

around May 2014, the Defendant advertised to E (tentative name F) and G (tentative name H), etc., who had reported on job offer advertisements via D sites, as condition that they provide 8-90,000 won per customer per customer, and advertised to “K,” which is an Internet sexual traffic brokerage site, “I, J, etc.,” and then reported to be “K” from May 2014 to November 15, 2014, the Defendant received approximately 13-140,000 male descendants from 270 male descendants, who had reported to be leased, to have them attend sexual intercourse with female employees, thereby obtaining approximately KRW 13.5 million in total.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol for G, L, M, or E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to lease contract, text message, investigation report (calculated amount of additional collection);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. is that the defendant rents two officetels and hires two females engaged in sexual traffic, making use of the Internet for a period of five months and then arranges sexual traffic, and the punishment for the crime is not somewhat minor;

However, it seems that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and is against his own mistake in depth.

In addition, the sentencing criteria of the Sentencing Committee shall be balanced by taking into account the circumstances of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the defendant, character and conduct, the environment, family relationship, and all other conditions of sentencing shown in the argument of this case