The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:10 on July 5, 2016, the Defendant took a bath to “D” operated by the Defendant located in Gwangju-si, the Defendant: (a) the luminous viewing E and the public officials affiliated with the Defendant expressed that the Defendant would be able to cover up the objects of prohibition of parking in front of the said real estate; (b) the Defendant’s assaulted the Defendant by tightly pushing the said F’s shoulder shoulder by hand; and (c) the Defendant “from the parking control,” and “public officials must die at all times.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties on the control of illegal things placed on the street by public officials F in Gwangjin Viewing Service.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (Article 1 million won of a fine and one million won of a day of confinement for exchange): Consideration, such as the first offender who reflects his mistake in this Court, the degree of violence is minor, and the use of a letter by a public official in charge is taken into account);