A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the call center, who has served as a telephone for the victims at the call organization.

At around 12:00 on September 8, 2017, the Defendant phoneed the victim B from the call center located in the city of Isra, the name of the Chinese City of Isra, and the Defendant calls the victim B to the victim, and “I have been subject to the Seoul Central District Prosecutor 1 Division C investigator of Seoul High-tech Investigation. Mey D’s daily allowance, and there has been a large amount of passbook. There is also a bank account in the Republic of Korea. At this point, I have to confirm whether the money in the account of B is related to a crime. I have to confirm. I have to keep the inspector’s book safely. I have to keep the money in the account. To keep it in the safe safe depository, I have to false statement that “I have to appoint the E institution staff to keep it in the safe depository.” On the same day, women, who could not know the name of the E institution acting as agent, received money from the victim in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul and 10,000 won in front of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement No. B

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 347(1) and Article 30(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts and Article 347(1) of the Act on the Selection of Imprisonment [Scope of Recommendation] systematic fraud [where mitigation area (100 million won or less) (1 to 2 years and 6 months) is mitigated (1 to 100 million won] or where considerable damage was recovered (1 to 200], the defendant appears to have an attitude to recognize and reflect his/her criminal act, 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and that he/she is the first offender,

However, the so-called “wishing” crime, such as the instant case, is a systematic, intelligent, and active criminal method causing considerable damage to our society, and thus, the need for strict punishment is very high, and the Defendant assumes a false investigator at a call center in China, and then assumes the victim.