logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.11.22 2016나4959
매매대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. According to Gap evidence Nos. 2 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 10 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff, on July 8, 2014, sold KRW 163 Dong apartment units 1902 (hereinafter "the real estate of this case") to the defendants in purchase price of KRW 358,00,00, and completed the registration of ownership transfer to the defendants on July 17, 2014. However, on August 20, 2014, Eul filed a lawsuit claiming for cancellation of ownership registration against the defendants on the ground of fraudulent act as Suwon District Court No. 2014Ga49476 (hereinafter "the lawsuit claiming cancellation of ownership"), and the plaintiff and the defendants shall pay KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, which were paid by the defendants to the defendants for the aforementioned lawsuit for cancellation of ownership registration (the plaintiff and the defendants shall pay KRW 508,000,00,00,000).

The plaintiff does not pay 4 million won despite having been paid the costs of the lawsuit for cancellation of ownership by E.

arrow