The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dispute Resolution Committee D and 403.

When a manufacturer or importer of products subject to safety assurance intends to modify a report on safety verification, he/she shall report such modification to the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Information and Communication.

Nevertheless, on November 18, 2016, the Defendant reported the safety confirmation with respect to a light-based monitor (electronic lockboard). On February 23, 2017, the Defendant supplied three monitors manufactured in the G Middle School Office of Gyeongnam-do Office of Education at the Gyeongnam-do Office of Education, which is a product subject to safety verification, to the G Middle School at the Gyeongnam-do Office of Education, which is a product subject to safety verification, and did not report the safety verification and use different electric wire parts, but did not report the safety verification.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the third public trial date);

1. A written accusation;

1. On-site certificates;

1. Application of statutes to a self-verification certificate on November 18, 2016;

1. Relevant Article 40 of the relevant Act, the choice of electrical appliances subject to punishment, and the safety control of consumer products, and the main sentence of Article 40 (1) 18 and Article 15 (2) of the Safety Control of Consumer Products, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Pronouncement [The suspended sentence: fine of 700,000 won; detention in a workhouse: 100,000 won per day; the investigation of the electric source code reported by the Defendant was unable to purchase the electric source code due to a default on payment; and the use of the electric source code of another investigation; in the case of electric source code, "main manufacturer and other KS or KS-certified enterprise" can be reported; most of the Defendant used the electric source code certified by KC (30 out of the total 33 units; 30 units thereafter; and the replacement with the electric source code certified by KC) and completed prior to the installation of the subsequent report on modification;