Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 13:50 on January 22, 2018, the Defendant was driving C QM6 car in the direction of the Dominary Underground Road in the direction of the Dominary Underground Road in the direction of the friendly movement.

At the time, the location was an intersection with signal apparatus, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by observing signal to the person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, while driving the above private distance as it was due to the negligence of driving the above private distance on the side of the above vehicle while the Defendant neglected it, received the front portion of the E-to-land driven by the victim D (the age of 61) who driven by the victim D (the age of 61) who driven the above private distance in the direction of the government in the direction of both sides, and caused the victim to go beyond the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as the left-hand elel of the executives requiring approximately 12 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommended punishment] of the Criminal Act [the grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Order to Attend shall be [the scope of recommended punishment] of the mitigated area (one month to eight months), [the person specially mitigated] of punishment not (including efforts to recover damage] [the decision of sentence] of the defendant who violated the traffic signals] of the defendant causing serious injury to the victim due to the negligence of violating the traffic signals. The defendant's negligence and the result of the crime should be selected as imprisonment without prison labor.

Even if the defendant left the scene immediately after the accident and the nature of the crime is not good, the defendant was unaware of the fact that the accident occurred.

The arguments are asserted and, in light of the circumstances, those arguments.