A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 20, 2014, at around 02:55, the Defendant, while refusing to pay a taxi fee, using a taxi and then refusing to use the taxi. On March 20, 2014, the Defendant stated that “nicking, interference is being done,” on the ground that he is bad to ask questions about the case from the slope E belonging to the attached slope E of the Hadong Police Station, dispatched to the scene after receiving a report from the taxi engineer, and that “nicking, interfered with,” the Defendant saw the flab of the police officer’s flab and cut down the flab on the flab of the police officer, and flashed the police flab by flashing the flab of the police officer, and continuously flad the police officer’s face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the notification of the police officer 112 and the dispatch of the site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. G statements;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Consideration to the fact that the defendant has agreed smoothly with the police officer victimized by the defendant and to the fact that the defendant has no same criminal record);