logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.08.06 2013고단2735
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

In Daegu District Prosecutors' Office 2013 type 19567 case 10,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On June 17, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and on August 27, 2008, the above judgment became final and conclusive on August 27, 2008, and the parole period was expired on May 1, 2009 during the execution of the sentence in the racing prison, and the parole period was expired on June 24, 2009.

"2013 Highest 2735" against the elderly housing owners who paid housing rental advertisements, the Defendant 10,000 won cashier's checks, which were held as if they were to enter into a lease contract for the relevant housing, were presented as if they were cashier's checks of KRW 1,00,00,000, which were held as if they were cashier's checks of KRW 1,000,000,000, which were paid as checks, and tried to take money by means of escape by receiving the cash by falsity

1. On March 19, 2013, the Defendant presented 100,000 won cashier’s checks to the victim D located in Daegu Suwon-gu C, stating that “The Defendant had reported the front door to grant the bank to the victim” at the time of the victim D’s house located in Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, 2013, and that “The money now now intended to enter into the lease contract shall not exceed KRW 1,00,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000 won.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to rent the room or pay one million won in the down payment.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 700,000 won from the victim, namely, the name of the victim, and acquired it by deception.

2. On March 28, 2013, the Defendant presented 1:20,00 won cashier’s checks to the victim F located in Daegu Suwon-gu E, stating that “The Defendant had reported the front door to grant the bank to the victim” at the victim’s house, “The Defendant had reported the front door to the front door, and the money now at the time to enter into the lease contract changed the KRW 500,000 won check to the KRW 500,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000 won checks to the KRW 1,000,000,000.

However, the defendant is not guilty.

arrow