logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.02.03 2013고단3096
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment against the defendant not guilty.

Reasons

1. The part of the defendant in the separate criminal facts in the indictment of this case (retailing the suspect as the defendant) is the same as the defendant.

2. As to the above facts charged, a public prosecutor has been prosecuted by applying Article 86 and Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995) or Article 86 and Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and Article 86 and Article 83 (1) 2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), but the Constitutional Court imposed a fine on the pertinent juristic person's agent's violation of Article 201Hun-Ga24 and Article 28 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 9920 of Oct. 28, 2010).

Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, it is judged not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment is publicly announced under Article 440

arrow