logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.05.28 2014고정706
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is engaged in driving a DNS car (hereinafter referred to as “AV car”), which is engaged in driving.

On March 6, 2014, at around 19:15, the Defendant driving a sea-going vehicle, and driving the front road of the cell phone in front of the cell phone dong-gu, Gwangju, at the speed of the emergency room in the direction of the sub-lease hospital from the on-side side of the river, and the vehicle was parked on the right side of the road.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, and has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reporting the traffic situation well and driving safely.

Nevertheless, due to negligence, the Defendant neglected this, left the FNAS car (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) of the Victim E (Nam, 23 years old) parked on the right-hand side of the running direction, and escaped as it is without immediately unloading the damaged vehicle and without taking necessary measures so that the repair cost equivalent to KRW 421,568, which is 421,568, can be seen as the front panion and bend part of the driver’s panion of the damaged vehicle, while leaving the harming vehicle on the two-lane side of the driving direction, and leaving it away without leaving it on the two-lanes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. E statements;

1. A traffic accident report and a traffic accident report;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148 and Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting a crime;

1. The defense counsel regarding the assertion of the defense counsel under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Code of the Act on the Detention in the House of Labor and Labor. The defense counsel did not control or drive the fugitives of the damaged vehicle on the road or when the defendant escaped from the scene of the accident in this case. As a result, the escape of the defendant causes danger and impediment to traffic.

arrow