The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following factors: (a) the Defendant had a history of criminal punishment for larceny crimes and unlicensed driving several times; (b) the Defendant began to commit habitual larceny crimes in this case on 30,000 after the execution of punishment by larceny, etc. was completed; and (c) the Defendant committed nine or more times during the short period of two months; (d) the elements of disadvantageous sentencing, such as the fact that the Defendant did not recover damage from the crime of larceny and the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents; (e) the factors of favorable sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) other favorable factors, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and consequence of the crime; and (e) the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines (at least one month of imprisonment) as indicated in the records and arguments of the instant case, etc., the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.