The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the absence of any fact that the Defendant merely attempted to bring victims into confusion, and did not gather F, E, and criminal acts from the beginning for the purpose of money, and there was no fact that the Defendant delivered F in the J hotel parking lot or delivered three in Mali or Malis to F, and there was no fact that the Defendant requested the victims to pay money in return for release, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case.

B. The lower court’s sentencing (five years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts (1) is that the Defendant (one person C) is a person who resides in the Republic of the Republic of the Philippines, resides in the Republic of Korea, runs away against Korean tourists, and was in close relation with E running an entertainment drinking house called “D” in the Pyeongtaek Republic of Korea.

F On February 11, 2012, after receiving a request from H of the G Sports Association, G 12 members, including G 12 members, wanting to travel to the Philippines, F, the first day of the same month, and the first day of the same month, at around 08:10, the 12 members of G 12 were led to departure from the Republic of the Philippines.

F, around 19:00 on February 11, 2012, the F sent 12 members to “D” main points of E operation in line with the scheduled schedule, and 12 members, upon E’s good offices, introduced a loan with the nationality of the Philippines, and paid the expenses in advance, and then made a loan with entertainment and entertainment from around that time to the 12th day of the same month.

However, around February 12, 2012, there was a situation where some of female contact loans were injured and requested to replace them with other contact loans. Some of the members should be refunded part of the pre-paid money and requested F to receive refund from E, and the victim I expressed a complaint, such as demanding F to receive refund, and the victim I made an inevitable action against F, such as speaking against F, which led to a situation where F and E’s appraisal becomes upper.

This is derived from F. F.