logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.07.10 2020나41235
정산금 등 청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The judgment on the grounds for appeal and the grounds for appeal by the plaintiff of the first instance judgment are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court. Considering the evidence presented by the plaintiff in the first instance court, the following evidence are as follows: ① ownership transfer registration for each of the instant land constituting the site of the building was completed in four names, including the plaintiff, the defendant, C, and D, after the enforcement of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name, the plaintiff’s co-ownership in 1996 was completed due to the cancellation of title trust in the deceased H; ② ownership transfer registration for each CD’s co-ownership was completed in the future; ② ownership registration for the building was completed on October 20, 209, after the completion of July 193, 209; ② ownership transfer registration for the plaintiff’s co-ownership was just one of the above co-owners’ rights to the above land and each of the above co-owner’s co-owner’s co-ownership right was maintained until the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the first instance.

arrow