A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. Violation of traffic Acts on roads;

A. On February 13, 2016, the Defendant driven B K3 cars under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.140% at the 10km crossing of the national highway route 923 14 meters at the 10km away from the front of the shouldered village in front of the gambling in the gambalp in the gambalp in the gambalp in the gambling of the gambalp in the gambalp in the gambling of the gambalp in the gambalp of the city.

B. On March 10, 2016, the Defendant driven B K3 cars while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 50 meters alcohol level 0.085% from the front day of the Seoul fishing day to the front day of the Gu Goo-gu in the same Ri located in the same Ri, which was around March 10, 2016, on March 10, 2016.

2. On February 13, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death and Injury caused before the risk) driven in a state of alcohol level of 0.140% of alcohol level among the blood transfusion around 20:10 on February 13, 2016, the Defendant driven a vehicle for the use of BK3 in a state of red, stringing, and is not clear, and a large distance of walking. However, the Defendant driven a vehicle for the use of BK 3 in a state of a narrow distance, driving a vehicle for the use of BK 923 and 14 in front of the national road traffic tourist guidance center at the intersection of the two-lane in the direction of the air-line in the direction of the air-line.

At the time, it was difficult to drive a road at night, and at the same time, a person engaged in driving service in the state of milched surface had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the boom and the left and right, and accurately manipulating the steering direction and the brake system.

However, the Defendant neglected to do so and continued to drive the victim C(40) who was in the front signal atmosphere, and received the front part of the part following the Hastna taxi in the front direction.

After all, the defendant, while driving a motor vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to influence of alcohol, is in the same E (n.e., being on the back of the above taxi) where the defendant was on the ground that he/she should give approximately two weeks medical treatment to the above victim by negligence.