logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.10.23 2015나5591
토지인도등
Text

1. The decision of the court of first instance is made in accordance with the amendment and expansion of the purport of the claim in the trial of the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant).

Reasons

1. In the first instance trial of this Court, the plaintiff Eul filed a claim against the defendant F to remove without walls, ② the claim for delivery of each real estate as stated in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2, ③ the claim for delivery of each real estate as stated in the separate sheet Nos. 3, 4 and 5, ② the claim against the defendant F to return rent for the real estate as stated in the separate sheet No. 6, ② the claim against the defendant F to return unjust enrichment equivalent to rent and rent for each real estate as stated in the separate sheet No. 7 and 8, ③ the plaintiff A filed a claim against the defendant F for the contract deposit against the defendant F, ② the plaintiff's request for removal of freezing warehouse against the defendant F, the plaintiff's request for delivery of each real estate as stated in the separate sheet No. 7 and 8, and all of the above claims against the defendant F were accepted by the court of first instance against the defendant F. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant F. The above part of the plaintiff's claim against the defendant F.

2. Basic facts

A. On August 15, 2005, the plaintiff A submitted a list 1 and 2.

arrow