logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.10.02 2017고단734
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 20, 2015, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim C with the clothes placed by the Defendant (E) in Gumi-si, Gumi-si, “E” that the Defendant repaid the Defendant C with the obligation of the number of days borrowed at a high interest rate of lending money and repaid within 20 days.

The clothes of approximately KRW 40 million in one month can be fully repaid because it is conducting funeral services.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay in accordance with the agreement, even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party, because he/she is liable for a large amount of money that he/she cannot receive with the property of the defendant

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 9,50,000 from the national bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim, and received KRW 67,95,00 from the victim, including from August 31, 2015, total sum of KRW 6,795,00 from the victim, as shown in attached Table 1.

2. The Defendant committed a crime against the Victim F, on March 16, 2016, committed with respect to the victim F, in the “E” room for clothes as indicated in paragraph (1) around March 16, 2016, to the victim F of insurance design “the sales of clothes are KRW 50 million per month.”

It is intended to pay 80,000,000 won and pay 20,000 won monthly interest and take out an insurance policy.

There is no problem in the repayment of principal because of good sales.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay in accordance with the agreement, even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party, because he/she is liable for a large amount of money that he/she cannot receive with the property of the defendant

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim as above and received KRW 10 million from the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim, and from that time to July 20, 2016, he received KRW 14.55 million in total from the victim, such as the case of the attached Table 2.

arrow