1. The Defendant’s KRW 58,500,000 as well as annual 5% from April 9, 2015 to October 27, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. Case history

A. The Plaintiff’s acquisition and transfer of the instant D land and the instant housing 1) is 95 square meters in Gunsan-si, Gunsan-si (hereinafter “instant D land”).

2) The building of this case hereinafter referred to as “the building of this case”) is located on the ground of F No. 4 in Gunsan City.

On December 13, 1995, the Plaintiff acquired ownership and completed the ownership preservation registration in the name of the Plaintiff, and resided in the building of this case. On October 4, 1995, the Plaintiff purchased 95/2603 of G’s equity interest in the FF land in Kunsan-si and completed the Plaintiff’s ownership transfer registration in the future on November 15, 1995. On June 21, 2001, the co-ownership acquired as above was divided into D’s parcel number in the instant land due to the confirmation of partition under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Partition of Co-Owned-Owned Land. On June 21, 2001, the Plaintiff registered the sole owner of D’s land divided as above (No. 16 evidence No. 16, No. 7) as the third child of the Plaintiff, and thus, was detained in civil disputes involving H’s inside land, and the Plaintiff extended the amount of the maximum debt amount to H’s land to the Plaintiff on December 31, 2000.

As the plaintiff failed to pay this money, the decision of voluntary auction was rendered on January 6, 2003 at the request of I.

3) With respect to the Plaintiff’s children, the Plaintiff discussed how to continue residing the instant land and buildings at the auction procedure again. The Plaintiff’s children were first J, first son K, second son L, third son L, second H, and second son M. Since the economic situation is difficult, the J around June 8, 2002 left all the family members of the Defendant, etc., who are the mother’s home, and were residing in the instant D building (No. 8). However, there was no person capable of paying money for auction bidding among the Plaintiff’s children, and there was no person who can lend the Plaintiff’s name due to the obligation, etc.