The judgment below

The part of the case of the defendant is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for fifteen years.

2.1 per Dol, seized Dol.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentencing (12 years of imprisonment and confiscation) of the lower judgment by the Defendant and the person who requested an attachment order (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable.

B. (1) The sentencing of the lower judgment that was unfair for sentencing by the prosecutor is too uneasible.

When comprehensively considering the motive, means, and circumstances of the instant crime committed by the person who requested the attachment order, the part of the request for the attachment order, and the circumstances after the crime, the person who requested the attachment order is likely to repeat the murder crime.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which dismissed the request for attachment order.

2. Determination:

A. The Defendant and the requester for an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) recognize the instant crime as to the wrongful argument of sentencing.

In addition, the defendant suffered from her early illness for a long time and seems to have been under continuous medical treatment, which seems to have a significant impact on the crime of this case due to the decline in the ability to determine the disease of this case.

There is no particular criminal history in addition to the criminal records before the suspension of execution and the criminal records before the fine for a period of not less than 25 years.

However, the defendant murdered his her son by getting off his her son and her son from his her son on several occasions. The crime of this case is highly likely to be subject to criticism, and the several methods of crimes are very harsh and the nature of the crime is very harsh.

As such, the cruelness of the Criminal Procedure Act falls under the “cruel number of crimes” that the sentencing guidelines set forth as a special aggravated person, and thus, it should be reflected in the Defendant’s application of the sentencing guidelines.

In addition, due to the defendant's crime, the result of the victim's severe life was caused, and the bereaved families, including the victim's children, were also suffering from the irrecoverable mental suffering.

In particular, the victims' children, who are only elementary school students, are directly involved in the crime of this case.