1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 16, 2016, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a written notice demanding payment of the fee for the use of state property in arrears (unauthorized indemnity) as follows, and sent to the Plaintiff a written notice demanding payment of the fee for the use of state property in arrears by December 23, 2016.

In the case of the payment of the additional dues (additional dues) on the initial due date of payment for State property of the type of the next type of permission for the payer year, Plaintiff B 2009 1 without permission C. 102,871,09,090 of the previous due date of payment for State property of the type of permission for the payer year, the separate calculation is made for Plaintiff D 2015 1 without permission E, and for 17,031,650 of the previous due date of payment.

B. On December 28, 2016, pursuant to the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”), the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for disclosure of the following two items: (i) details of default on payment of attempted bonds with respect to Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Corporation (2009: (ii) year of imposition; (iii) year of imposition; (iv) year of imposition: B; year of imposition: year 2015; year 2015; year of permission number D); (iv) the receipt of prior notice of indemnity; and (v) the recipient of the notice of imposition of indemnity (hereinafter “instant information”).

C. On January 2, 2017, the Defendant decided to disclose the part of the instant information to the Plaintiff, on the ground that the instant information includes the name, resident registration number, etc. of a third party and constitutes information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1)6 of the Information Disclosure Act, the Defendant, pursuant to Article 14 of the Information Disclosure Act, made a decision to disclose the remainder of the instant information, excluding the information subject to non-disclosure (the notice of compensation, calculation sheet, paper guidance and paper notice, the name, address, resident registration number, handphone number, etc. of the addressee, customer, recipient, or recipient as indicated in the domestic registration paper, etc.).

(hereinafter “instant partial disclosure decision”) D.

On January 12, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Defendant that the instant information should not be disclosed because it does not constitute information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1)6 of the Information Disclosure Act, and the Defendant on January 19, 2017.