logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.05.27 2019가단1267
청구이의
Text

1. Based on the Defendant’s Jeju District Court’s 2019 Ghana60185 decision on performance recommendation for the claim for reimbursement against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On December 22, 2018, the Defendant indicated the claim: (a) paid the repair cost of D vehicles (the insurer of the vehicle) arising from the collision between the vehicle and D vehicles damaged due to the collision between the vehicle and E, and (b) claimed that the Plaintiff is the insurer of the E vehicle; (c) filed a claim for reimbursement against the Plaintiff under Jeju District Court 2019Da60185; and (d) rendered a decision of performance recommendation in the said case and confirmed.

However, the Plaintiff is not an insurer who entered into an insurance contract with E vehicles, and the Plaintiff is not liable for reimbursement. Thus, the Plaintiff is not liable for compulsory execution based on the above performance recommendation decision.

2. Article 208 (3) 1, and Article 257 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable Act.

arrow