The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the grounds for appeal of this case, the Defendant is against the recognition of the instant crime, and actively cooperates in the investigation, such as the confession of additional crimes at the investigation stage, and the victimO does not want the punishment against the Defendant, etc. are considered favorable to the Defendant.

However, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes even during the period of repeated crime upon the completion of the sentence of ten months on May 26, 2013, under which he/she was sentenced to criminal punishment, including imprisonment with prison labor for the same type of crime. The instant crime was committed by the Defendant who habitually used a parking lot, etc. which he/she prepared in advance and withdrawn or transferred cash using a stolen passbook, etc. using a stolen passbook. In light of the method of crime, it is not good for the Defendant to commit the crime. The Defendant committed the larceny crime by carrying the same criminal tools, such as fraud or handout, etc., which was planned and specialized in the criminal field; the Defendant committed the larceny crime repeatedly within a short period; the Defendant was arrested by the victim K in the act of larceny at night except for the victim'sO; the victim's remaining victims and victims from the investigation stage [the court below's recommendation from the victim]; the Defendant did not take corrective measures within the scope of the sentencing guidelines [the court below's recommendation from the committee for the punishment of larceny]