The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence (one year and six months of imprisonment, confiscation) imposed by the court below against the defendant in the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below leads to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects on the fact that the defendant made an agreement with four victims N et al. and five additional agreements were reached at the court below, and there was no record of criminal punishment, etc., in light of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, or the frequency of the crime of this case and the method of criminal punishment, and the defendant did not agree with 12 victims D et al. because he did not recover a considerable portion of damage caused by the crime of this case until the trial of the case. The crime of habitually theft of another person's property is punishable by imprisonment with prison labor or imprisonment with prison labor for not less than three years, and other unfavorable circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, the circumstances and result of the crime of this case, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case including the circumstances after the crime, etc., the above assertion of unfair sentencing is justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.