The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The prosecutor asserts that the sentence imposed by the court below against the Defendants is too unfasible and unfair.

2. According to the records, Defendant A started fighting first, Defendant A used violence for the first time to police officers who asked the circumstances of the case, Defendant B suffered significant damage to the structural frame of the 4 weeks of the above J by plucking, plucking, and plucking up the 4 weeks of the above J, and Defendant C re-offending during the period of probation. However, even though all the defendants reflects the mistake in depth, it is obvious that the defendants were under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant case; Defendants A and B did not have criminal records; Defendant A and B did not have criminal records; Defendant C’s participation was minor; Defendant C’s age, character, family environment, and all other circumstances such as workplace relationship are considered to have been given to the Defendants an opportunity to lead a normal social life only once, the sentencing of the lower court seems to be appropriate in this sense.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the prosecutor's argument is without merit.