beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 34,500,000 and the following day shall be 5% per annum from September 2, 2015 to January 9, 2018 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Defendant C and Plaintiff D and E (hereinafter collectively referred to as “C, etc.”) who were the president of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s directors, respectively.
(1) On January 29, 2015, in the instant case No. 2013 Go-Ma2671, the Defendant and Jeonbuk-gun (hereinafter “Defendant”) were convicted of the following criminal facts (hereinafter “C”) (two years of suspension of execution in six months of imprisonment, and one year of suspension of execution in four months of imprisonment in case D and E). On behalf of the Plaintiff on April 29, 2011, the summary, etc. of criminal facts of this Court No. 2013 Go-Ma2671, Apr. 29, 201, the real estate of this case is “real estate of this case.”
(2) The sales contract for the entire G 603 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant sales contract”) is the sales contract for the instant 603 square meters.
(2) In the conclusion of the contract, the court below's decision was affirmed on May 22, 2015 and rendered a final judgment of the court of first instance as follows: (a) although the parties had already negotiated the price of KRW 14,000,000, the sales price of KRW 362,321,000 was determined as if the amount was 15,50,000; (b) however, the parties failed to comply with the agreement; (c) as the Plaintiff's funds, to purchase the real estate of this case and the previous North Korea, 603 square meters of the land of this case at an appropriate price for the Plaintiff's interest and to appropriately preserve the Plaintiff's property by negotiating the sales price, etc.; and (d) thereby, to obtain pecuniary advantage equivalent to KRW 35,000,000,000 for the Plaintiff's property; and (d) C et al. filed an appeal against the judgment of the court of first instance on the ground of unfair sentencing.
(hereinafter referred to as "final criminal judgment"). (b)
The sales contract of this case concerning the payment of the purchase price stated in the sales contract of this case and the difference between the Defendant and the real estate of this case is indicated as KRW 356,50,000.