A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 15, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the offense of insult against Suwon District Court No. 405, 2014, 933, 933, at the court of Suwon District Court No. 405, 2015, 2015, and 201.

In front of the presiding judge of the first part of the above court criminal case of the above court in the trial of the above case, the defendant knew that the defendant attached or involved in an urgent public notice because there was three pages where the defendant (C), D, and E attached an urgent public notice (the provisional disposition decision) to the F Building Elevator as at the present issue.

② On October 25, 2013, Defendant (C) appears to have attached this urgent public notice is considered to be 141 photographs.

“The testimony was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the facts are well known that the CCTV screen pictures of "141th page", which the defendant selected, are the pages of attaching the F Building's main decision of 23081, around April 25, 2014 by Da, D, and E, and that it is irrelevant to the face of attaching an urgent public notice (the provisional disposition decision) and that the Defendant India's pictures do not take the face of an urgent public notice.

In this way, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of reference witnesses by the prosecution concerning C;

1. Recording notes (No. 3 of the evidence list), written opinions (Evidence No. 6 of the evidence list);

1. Investigation report (such as the analysis of suspect A submitted photographs) and the CCTV photographs attached thereto (the defendant and his defense counsel made a false testimony by mistake, and a photograph of 141 CCTV screen pictures (hereinafter referred to as "the photograph of this case") as stated in the newspaper held after false testimony;

(1) The time, circumstances, etc. of the recording

The testimony asserts to the effect that the testimony was implicitly withdrawn by mistake.

The defendant is supported by the Suwon Law of the Republic of Korea.