Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000. If the Defendant fails to pay the said fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the president of the F University.

On October 14, 2014, the Defendant received a written request for witness attendance from the Chairperson of the National Assembly Education, Culture, Sports and Tourism Tourism Tourism and Tourism Committee (No. 506 of this Sub-section) to attend the National Assembly’s Office of Education, Culture and Tourism and Tourism and Culture and Tourism under the name of the Chairperson of the National Assembly’s Education, Culture and Tourism Tourism and Tourism Culture and Tourism Committee (No. 506 of this Sub-Section) on October 10, 2014 in relation to the issue of “F University’s normalization of its operation, etc.” from the president office of F University located in G.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not appear as a witness without good cause.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and I;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of statement concerning J, K, H, L, and I;

1. A written accusation;

1. A copy of the request for witness attendance ( October 1, 2014);

1. A copy of the postal item receipt ledger;

1. A copy of a statement of reasons for non-appearance upon the request of a witness to attend ( October 23, 2014);

1. The immigration status of each individual;

1. Application of statutes to a copy of a report on the results of meetings of the Third Party International Exchange Commission, 2014;

1. Article 12 (1) of the relevant Act on Criminal Facts and Article 12 (1) of the Act on Testimony, Appraisal, etc. before the National Assembly for the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserted the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the provisional payment order by the president of the National University, who visited China from October 25, 2014 to October 28, 2014 in order to conclude a mutual exchange agreement with China, and accordingly failed to comply with the request for attendance of the National Assembly.

Therefore, the absence of the defendant in the National Assembly has justifiable reasons.

Judgment

Article 2 of the Act on Testimony, Appraisal, etc. before the National Assembly provides that any person shall comply with a request from the National Assembly to attend as a witness in connection with the deliberation on a bill, the inspection or investigation of the state administration, and Article 12(1) of the same Act.