A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2013, around 21:39, the Defendant driven a Category B motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.307% from the front brand of the “Yawon” to the front road of the “Yawon” to the front road of the “Yawon”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the report on the status of a drinking driver;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of sound driving and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., circumstances favorable to the following reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following circumstances shall be considered in light of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Probation Act, and Article 62-2 of the Act on the Order of Community Service and Order of Education, and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. repeats the same type of crime even though the defendant had the previous record of detection of drinking driving and punishment, and the blood alcohol concentration at the time of detection is reasonable to the extent that normal driving is impossible at the time of detection, and causes traffic accidents under the influence of drinking driving, etc., the defendant's responsibility is heavy. However, the defendant is against the facts of the crime, there is no record of the crime heavier than a fine for the last five years

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.