Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for 5 months, for Defendant B, for 10 months, for Defendant C, and for 7,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, at the Seoul Central District Court on August 29, 2014, was sentenced to three years of suspension of execution on January 1 and June, 2015 due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the organization activity of an organization, etc.) by acting as a member of a "crime-brupt" organization in a violent organization at the Seoul Central District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 7, 2015, and is currently during

Defendant

B On June 29, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court was to act as a member of the "crime response" behavior at the Seoul Central District Court, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the organization activity of organizations, etc.), and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 7, 2015.

[2] The crime committed by Defendant A, Defendant C, and Defendant D constitute an unlawful certification device (hereinafter “illegal certification device”) on May 2015, 2015, in order to dissipe the “sing-to-sing-to-sing-s-to-s-to-s-to-s-to-s-to-s-to-s-to-s-to-s-s-to-s-to-s-s-to-s-s-to-s-s-to-s-s-to-s-

A request for production is made, and 9750,000 won was given to the victim under the pretext of the cost of manufacturing illegal certification devices, but the victim did not manufacture the illegal certification device until the date the person was promised to do so. In addition, Defendant A, who was the aftermath of Defendant A, was found to have removed money from the victim on the ground that he was a victim of violence.

Defendant

A around 22:30 on June 3, 2015, in the “Ring practice hall” of Defendant C’s operation located in Q Q in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, and the victim who received contact and arrived after receiving contact does not treat the victim from the “Ying Wing Wing Wing Wing Wing Wing Wing Wingk

Defendant C, which was adjacent to this farb, read the sound “?” and the farbly knows who the farb is farc

Dogs walk walk walk

Defendant A, in other words, is able to do so in the form of the fl.b. the f. k. k. k. k.

Until now, spits frine frine, all frine frine frine frine frine frine, and frine frine frine frine.

2.3.