The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is unable to engage in an election campaign because he/she is the principal of the Do High School in Ansan-si and is a teacher of a private school who is unable to become a party member.

Nevertheless, at around 11:43 on March 22, 2012, the Defendant had access to smartphones used by the Defendant in the Defendant’s office located in the above D High School to the twitter in the name of the Defendant, and then had referred to the twitter in the former KBS E E, which read, “I will have the right to request the special lectures in the twitter. F Party G candidates will have the right to depart from this school. I will well help you have the right to request the election.” The Defendant sent letters supporting the G candidates who participated in the election of the 19th National Assembly member, and carried out an election campaign by a person who is unable to carry out an election campaign.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Twitter letters sent by a suspect and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a certificate of employment;

1. Article 255 (1) 2, Article 60 (1) 5, and Article 53 (1) 7 of the Public Official Election Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 22 (1) 2 of the Political Parties Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. A fine of 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day converted);

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence of sentence is an election campaign by transmitting letters supporting a specific candidate going to the election of a National Assembly member to another person’s Twitter, even though the Defendant could not engage in an election campaign as the principal of an private high school. In light of the strong power of the Internet-based media and the public nature of the public, etc., the Defendant’s above act is not less likely to impair the fairness of the election pursued by the Public Official Election Act. However, even though the Defendant’s mistake is contrary to the Defendant’s acknowledgement of the instant crime, and is the first offender with no criminal power, and the Defendant’s act is a high school manufacturer who has left the election of