logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.10.20 2015노1422
건축법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant (the factual errors and misapprehension of legal principles) was delegated to D all matters regarding the building permit, and accordingly, D reported the commencement of construction, and it was found that D had been lawfully permitted to extend construction, and there was no intention to violate the Building Act.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of violating the Building Act, thereby misunderstanding the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged and did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

① The Defendant, upon receiving a suspect examination from the prosecutor, stated that “D did not report the commencement of the construction work, and even if it remains, D would have started the construction work to be responsible, so that, the Defendant instructed K, the constructor, to start the construction work.”

(Evidence No. 100). (2) While making a telephone conversation with the police, H stated that “The design drawing was confirmed by D at the design office as well as F (the Defendant’s wife that actually carried out the extension of the instant house) and all of the removal of main stairs on the first floor or all of the construction works are merely limited to the display of design drawings.”

(3) On May 2, 2013, F voluntarily removed the defective part of the old office’s removal of a building, which was controlled by the Gu office and the removal of an illegal building.

Nevertheless, there is no evidence to see the FF as opposed to D at the time, and instead, F promoted that D will continue to receive the building permit while discussing the building permit between D and D.

D In June 24, 2013, after submitting an application for a building permit, the extension permission was granted, and F continued to implement the extension work.

(4) F.

arrow