beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 23, 2015, at around 01:55, the Defendant driven CM5 vehicles under the influence of alcohol with approximately 20km alcohol concentration of about 0.211% from the section of 20km to the front road of the KKVIEW 1 apartment.
2. A person who is engaged in driving service of the said vehicle for violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary measures after accidents);
On July 23, 2015, at around 01:55, the Defendant operated the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.211%, and operated the national highways No. 7 around the Geum-IC, which are in the interest rate of the river-based, from the racing to the port of port.
At the time, the EM car driven by the victim D (the age of 36) was in progress on the two-lanes in the direction of the driving of the car operated by the defendant at night, and therefore, the driver of the vehicle thoroughly takes the front side and left side side and left side side side side, and the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident by driving the vehicle safely through the first lane, instead of harming the two-lanes in which the vehicle of the victim is in progress by using the steering system and the brake system accurately.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving the said SM5 vehicle while driving the said SM5 vehicle, and the two-lanes of the said SM5 vehicle was placed in front of the right side of the said SM5 vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, suffered salt, tension, etc. from the victim in need of treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, escaped without any necessary measures such as stopping and saving the victim, even though the repair cost, such as the left side pentum exchange, was damaged to the extent that the repair cost is 650,868 won, such as the above pentum exchange, etc.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;