logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.07.18 2018나2070715
기타(금전)
Text

1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part is revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this part of the reasoning is as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (2nd 1 to 6th 7 pages) is the same, except where the court added or added the following.

(The main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). The two to three pages of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as “instant share acquisition agreement” and “the instant share acquisition agreement”) shall be construed as “the instant share acquisition agreement” and “the instant additional agreement” respectively.

2. The reasoning for this part of the judgment on the Defendant’s main defense is as follows, except for the case where the “Additional Agreement among the instant stock acquisition agreement” is stipulated as the “Additional Agreement” in the 6th of the judgment of the first instance, 10-9 and 16th of the said judgment, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance (No. 6th of the judgment of the first instance to 9th of the 7th 11th of the said judgment).

(3) On the ground that the Plaintiff’s acquisition of shares of this case also constitutes a violation of Article 6(3) of the Agreement, the Plaintiff’s acquisition of shares of this case constitutes a violation of Article 6(3) of the Agreement.

In this regard, the following paragraphs are examined.

The reasons stated in this part are as follows, except for the addition of Paragraph 4 to the judgment of the plaintiff as to the newly-established argument by this court, the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance 13 to No. 27 10).

(The main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). The "acquisition price" of the 11th judgment of the court of first instance shall be calculated by adding "acquisition price" to "acquisition price".

The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, 11 between 2 and 12, “at least from 12 to 2,” and the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “at least from 12 to 14,” shall be deleted.

The 13th parallel of the judgment of the first instance court and the 2016th parallel of the 13th parallel of the 13th parallel of the 2016th parallel of the 2016th parallel of the 2016 company.

16th 4th 18th 11th 2th 200.

arrow