The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are acknowledged, such as the confession of the crime of this case and the statement that the defendant has made his mistake repented in depth, the fact that the defendant appears to have cooperated in the investigation of the narcotics offender, and the long-term detention of the defendant may entail excessive difficulty to his dependants.

However, not only has the history of punishment several times for the same kind of crime, but also there is a high possibility of criticism by again committing the crime of this case during the repeated crime period due to the same kind of crime, social harm caused by the crime of narcotics, etc., and there is no special circumstance to change the sentence of the court below in the court below in light of sufficient consideration of the defendant's various circumstances, and there is no special circumstance to change the sentence differently in the court below. The court below's assertion is without merit in light of the balance with the general sentencing of the same and similar cases, and other various circumstances that are the conditions of the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, character and character, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, criminal records, criminal records, conditions after the crime, family relations, health conditions, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.