Defendant

A In six months of imprisonment, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,00,000, Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,00,00.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who actually operates the P Medical Care Center located in Siri-siO, and the defendant B, the defendant C, the defendant D, and the defendant E are medical care care care care workers under the above P Medical Care Center.

A medical care assistance provider is a person who visits the home to the elderly who is aged 65 years or older under the Long-Term Care Insurance Act and the Welfare of the Aged Act or under the age of 65, and visits the home to the elderly in the nature of the elderly, such as dementia, and provides him/her with services, such as physical activities, household activities, bathing, etc., who are the benefit for long-term care prescribed by the Long-Term Care Insurance Act.

If a medical care care provider provides home care benefits and enters the details thereof in the record of provision of long-term care benefits and submits them to the medical care center, the medical care center shall request long-term care benefits in a lump sum by accessing the Internet homepage of the National Health Insurance Corporation every month based on the record sheet, and the medical care center shall pay allowances to the medical care care care protection company based on the record sheet after receiving the long-term care benefits from the regional headquarters of the National Health Insurance Corporation around 25th of each

However, in this process, the Defendants did not accurately examine whether the National Health Insurance Corporation actually provided the benefits for long-term care and paid the long-term care benefits as they are according to the contents claimed by the Medical Care Center, and had the beneficiaries receive long-term care benefits, and had the National Health Insurance Corporation pay long-term care benefits to the National Health Insurance Corporation to obtain the said expenses by fraud

1. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint crime committed with the Defendant Company B, in collusion with the Defendant Company B for the medical care protection. In fact, Defendant B did not provide the beneficiary Q with the benefits of home care from May 1, 2010 to March 31, 2014, but Defendant B provided the said recipient with the benefits of home care.