1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The accident of this case 1) A A Track Vehicles (Driver B, hereinafter “Defendant Vehicles”).

(A) On May 21, 2014, the CA car (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff car”) whose lane was changed from the first lane to the second lane on the right side of the Mapo Airport to the second lane on the 4 lane near the Mapo Airport located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul along the 4 lane near the Mapo Airport.

2) The lower part of the right side of the Defendant vehicle conflict on the left side of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

2) As to the process of the instant accident, the Plaintiff asserted that, although the Plaintiff’s vehicle was entering the two-lanes, the Defendant’s vehicle was changing the two-lanes to the two-lanes, the lower part of the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle was in conflict with the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle while changing the two-lanes. While the Defendant’s vehicle was driving on the two-lanes, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was claiming that the collision between the Defendant’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle was committed while leaving the vehicle by changing the two-lanes in the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle, but the Plaintiff’s vehicle was in conflict with the Defendant’s vehicle while leaving the vehicle by changing the two-lanes on the two-lanes in the front side of the instant accident, it appears that the Plaintiff’s vehicle stopped immediately after the instant accident occurred with the Defendant’s vehicle’s front side, not only the two-lanes side but also the two-lanes side side of the instant vehicle, but also the front part of the Plaintiff’s front side of the instant vehicle.