logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.01.22 2020나52469
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

3. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The following facts may be acknowledged, either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, on the statements or images of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 10:

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract that contains an agreement on securing self-vehicle damage with respect to D vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”) with C, and the Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to E vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. At around 18:10 on November 8, 2018, C, while driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle and driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle to a 2 park face-to-face from the resignation to the resignation of the two-lanes at the Cheongju-si, and closing the left-to-hand turn to the left-hand turn at the 2nd seat of the 2nd seat of the 2nd seat of the 2nd seat of the 2nd seat of the 2nd seat of the 2nd seat of the 2nd seat of the resignation, the front part of the Plaintiff’s right-hand side of the 2nd seat of the 2nd seat of the 2nd seat of the resignation, conflicts with the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle that moved to the right-hand side of the 2nd seat of the 2nd seat of the 2nd seat of the 2nd road (hereinafter “

(c)

On October 17, 2019, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,018,000 as insurance money, excluding KRW 200,000,000, out of the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

2. Existence and scope of the obligation for indemnity.

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the instant accident was caused by the negligence of the Defendant vehicle driver. However, in full view of the aforementioned facts and the purport of the entire pleadings, the instant accident was caused by the negligence of the Defendant vehicle driver who attempted to make a right-hand turn without properly checking the driver’s negligence of the Plaintiff’s driver who did not go through the said intersection, and the progress of the Plaintiff’s vehicle who attempted to make a right-hand turn pursuant to the new subparagraph, while entering the said intersection.

Since it can be sufficiently recognized, the plaintiff's exemption from liability.

arrow