Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around 19:00 on December 9, 2017, at the same time, within the “Eju” operated by Defendant D (A) who is the victim D (FI) of the victim D (FI) of the victim D (FI) prior to the several years, Defendant A demanded the victim to leave the victim at the same day on the same day, and again found the victim again after going back to the same day on the same day on the ground that the victim was unable to pay monthly rent because the victim failed to properly operate his/her business, and the defendant A suffered injury, such as brain, fI and tension, so that he/she would not need any internal work, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor of the Silsan-dong-gu-gu-gu-gu-gu-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-SIB-do-based injury to the victim for about 14 days.

As a result, Defendant A jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendants: (a) around 19:00 on December 9, 2017, and (b) up to “Eju” operated by Defendant A D (the 62-year-old), Defendant A’s speechered victim D (the 62-year-old age), Defendant A started operating the business by providing the victim with KRW 20 million operating funds; (b) Defendant A started operating the business but the victim was unable to pay monthly rent due to his failure to properly operate the business; (c) on the same day, Defendant A demanded the victim to leave the victim at around the morning; and (d) returned back again, and the Defendant A would be called as “no need to work, and any money is required”; and (d) Defendant B would also take the victim’s dead arms with his hand, and (e) expressed that “I will drink a Chewing person” with both hand, thereby damaging the victim’s right.