logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.10.23 2015고단1436
상습절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2001, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Jeonju District Court on October 24, 2002 and two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a short term of one year and six months in the same court on October 24, 2002, and ten months in the Jeonju District Court on November 2, 201. On July 25, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Jeonju District Court on July 25, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence on August 23, 2013.

On May 13, 2015, at around 15:54, the Defendant habitually stolen or attempted property worth KRW 16,214,000,000, total market value of KRW 16,214,000 by the same method over 11 times, as indicated in the list of crimes, from around that time to August 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened a FF car with no corrective device by the victim E in front of the “D” discount store located in YY-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City; and (b) stolen or attempted property worth KRW 10,000,000,000, which includes cash and check owned by the victim in the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to G, H, I, and J;

1. It is obvious that the “statement” Nos. 74 in K, L, E, M, N,O, and P Evidence List is a clerical error in the statement.

each statement of the Commission;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Each report on the occurrence of each thief incident, each report on the investigation, and each report on the internal investigation;

1. On-site photographs, photographs at the scene of the crime, and reports on requests for appraisal;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal history records, inquiry reports (A), investigation reports (revolving and verifying repeated crimes of suspects), investigation reports (Attachment to previous records of suspects and court rulings), investigation reports (lists of related cases and filing of identical criminal records and court rulings);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow